Online Payment Contact Us
Employment Law & Litigation

Privacy in the Workplace: Employee Searches

Lasher
Apr 15, 2021

(This blog is the second installment in a multi-part series regarding privacy in the workplace.)

Employers have a general right to protect their property and employees. In addition to surveillance and monitoring, some employers choose to conduct searches of areas and equipment used by employees. This can include searches of offices, lockers, desks, phones, computers, and cars. The employer’s rights to conduct searches, however, are limited by the Fourth Amendment (in the case of public employers) and relevant state statutes and case law (in the case of private employers).

Employers considering searching an employee’s workspace or belongings need to know that such a search may give rise to privacy claims if the employee has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the property or area searched. This is a fact-specific determination turning on whether and to what extent the area searched is open and accessible to others. The employer takes an even greater risk when searching property away from the workplace or items that are clearly personal to the employee, such as a purse or briefcase, are more likely to give rise to employer liability.

Although often discussed in the context of employee monitoring, the installation and use of a Global Positioning System tracker on a car is actually considered a “search.” Employers generally enjoy broad freedom when monitoring company-owned vehicles with GPS devices. Employers’ rights to install and monitor a GPS device on an employee –owned vehicle, however, is much more limited. Some states, such as California, Connecticut, Delaware, and Texas, have laws requiring employee notice or consent before placing a GPS on an employee-owned car. For example, California Penal Code § 637.7 makes it a misdemeanor to install a GPS device to a person’s car without consent. Likewise, any GPS monitoring must also be reasonable in its scope.

An employer can likely diminish an employee’s expectation of privacy in an area or device being searched by putting the employee on notice that a search may occur. Additionally, if an employer can conduct a search, it may also give consent to the police to conduct the search without a warrant.

If you are an employer and you are considering conducting a search in the workplace, the employment attorneys here at Lasher Holzapfel Sperry & Ebberson are ready to take your call.

Lasher
Apr 15, 2021

Insights from Employment Law & Litigation

The Rules of Washington Noncompetition Agreements May Change Again
Corporate & Business Law
Employment Law & Litigation
Business Litigation

The enforceability of noncompetition agreements is a widely debated topic in and outside of the legal world. In just the last year, it has been a repeat topic on the floor of the Washington state legislature. States across the county are seeing a trend toward the unenforceability of overly restrictive restraints on employees’ trade. Currently, […]

Read More
The Rules of Washington Noncompetition Agreements Have Changed
Business Litigation
Corporate & Business Law
Employment Law & Litigation

As of June 2024, the legal parameters of Washington noncompetition agreements were refined by the passing of Substitute Senate Bill 5935. The bill, which passed by the Legislature in February and was signed into law by Governor Jay Inslee in March, took effect on June 6, 2024. Amending five provisions of RCW 49.62, the new […]

Read More

150

Years of combined experience

Best Law Firms

Ranked regionally in 10 practice areas in the 2025 edition of Best Law Firms®

Band 1

In the Chambers Global High Net Worth Guide in Family/Matrimonial Law

Trusted Legal Support for Your Business and Family
Our experienced Seattle attorneys provide strategic legal guidance for businesses and individuals. Whether you are navigating a complex transaction or facing a sensitive family law issue, we are here to help each step of the way.

Contact Us