In 2014, long before the pandemic spurred the proliferation of short-term residential home rentals like those offered through Airbnb and other services, the Washington Supreme Court in Wilkinson v. Chiwawa Community Associations addressed whether a homeowners’ association (“HOA”) exceeded its power to amend covenants when a simple majority of the homeowners voted to prohibit short-term rentals like those offered through Airbnb and other services. The Court ultimately determined that if an HOA maintains a governing covenant that authorizes its members to change only existing covenants (which is common for many Western Washington neighborhoods), this level of authority does not extend to an HOA seeking to adopt a new covenant, which requires unanimous membership approval versus a simple or super majority. Accordingly, and should an HOA wish to adopt a new covenant banning short-term rentals where no such covenant exists in the governing documentation, all homeowners must uniformly agree to the ban setting the threshold for approval much higher. The Court further determined that an adopted covenant is a “change” when it is “consistent with the general plan of development and related to an existing covenant.” Recently, the Washington Court of Appeals (Division III) encountered the same issue in Twin W Owners’ Association v. Murphy as to whether a homeowner’s association may amend its restrictive covenants to ban or highly regulate the use of a given residence as a short-term vacation rental. Judge Fearing authored the opinion for analogous circumstances where the relevant covenants similarly did not contain a provision that reserved to the HOA the power to add new covenants. Just as the Supreme Court ruled in Wilkinson, Division III found that( — because the governing covenants only authorized a change to the existing covenants and the to-be adopted covenant was a new covenant) the HOA’s supermajority vote invalidating short-term rentals was void and the lower court’s ruling was affirmed. Again, unanimous approval was required for the covenant just as in Wilkinson. Notably though, with his opinion in Murphy, Judge Fearing took issue with the Supreme Court’s decision in Wilkinson. Specifically, Division III noted that historical covenants or those similar to the pertinent ones at issue in Murphy “never contemplated the use of land within associations for short-term vacation rentals” and that “no one expected a burgeoning short-term vacation rental industry.” Judge Fearing raises a valid point. Requiring such a high threshold to effect provisions governing short-term rentals, especially for remote or older neighborhoods that typically do not have covenants limiting or banning short-term rentals, could leave those associations hamstrung from implementing protective covenants. While such latitude provides greater commercial freedoms for certain homeowners, the inability to regulate short-term rentals can come at the expense of neighborhood tranquility and the attendant issues associated with rowdy/short-term vacationers and users. Unless the current law in Washington is altered, homeowners and buyers should be wary of covenants pertaining to short-term rentals (or the absence thereof) when buying or selling a home. Such issues can become thorny and potentially lead to litigation among neighbors/associations. The lawyers at Lasher are available to help you evaluate association covenants and amendments thereof.

Is There Anything My Neighborhood Can Do to Ban Short-Term Rentals?

In 2014, long before the pandemic spurred the proliferation of short-term residential home rentals like those offered through Airbnb and other services, the Washington Supreme Court in Wilkinson v. Chiwawa Community Associations addressed whether a homeowners’ association (“HOA”) exceeded its power to amend covenants when a simple majority of the homeowners voted to prohibit short-term

Judgment Collection: Using Charging Orders to Acquire LLC Membership Interests

Judgment creditors often encounter challenges when trying to collect a debt when a debtor’s assets are held in a limited liability company (LLC), as opposed to assets held directly in the debtor’s name. However, creditors have legal remedies available to address this situation. One useful remedy is a charging order, a legal tool codified under

Avoid the Estate Planning Exemption Cliff: Plan to Take Advantage of the Current Exemption Before it Expires

In an effort to provide Americans with various forms of tax relief, in 2017 Congress enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”). This act provided tax reductions in many different categories, but one of the most significant was that it nearly doubled the Estate Tax and Lifetime Gifts Exemption (“Exemption”). However, these tax

Eight Things to Consider if You Want to Sell Your Business

Selling a business is a significant milestone. Whether you’re moving on to new ventures, retiring, or simply cashing in on your hard work, the process involves more than just finding a buyer and cashing a check. Selling your business is a complex process that requires careful planning, due diligence, and legal consideration. Here are a

What Does the Corporate Transparency Act Mean to Me and My Business?

A few years ago, Congress passed the Corporate Transparency Act, 31 U.S.C. 5336 (“CTA”), which established certain required information filings with the U.S. Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”). The purpose of the CTA is to create a national database of companies in the U.S. that identifies the people behind the companies (both owners and

Interested in an Accessory Dwelling Unit in Washington State? Be Sure to Research the Regulations for Compliance

In recent years, the interest in Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) has grown exponentially in response to housing shortages and affordability issues. The regulatory landscape for ADUs is dynamic and can be affected by changes at local, state, and/or federal levels. It is crucial for property owners and builders to be informed about the latest requirements

Business Obligations Under the Corporate Transparency Act: What You Need to Know

The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) was enacted to enhance corporate transparency and combat illicit activities such as money laundering and tax evasion. While the primary focus of the CTA is unearthing those involved in illicit activities, most businesses fall under the broad reach of the new legislation. With an effective date of January 1, 2024

Breaches of Fiduciary Duties in Closely Held Companies

In Washington State, closely held companies are those in which the ownership is concentrated among a small number of shareholders. These companies may also be family-owned or held by a group of individuals who have a relationship with one another beyond just being co-owners. While these companies may have a different dynamic than public corporations,

Legal Concerns of Real Estate in the Metaverse: Navigating the Virtual Frontier

The concept of the metaverse, a virtual world where users interact with digital environments and each other in immersive ways, has gained significant attention in recent years. With advancements in virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies, the metaverse is becoming more accessible and has the potential to revolutionize various industries, including real estate.

Commercial Tenant Evictions and What You Need to Know in Seattle

Mayor Bruce Harrell officially ended the City of Seattle Civil Emergency Proclamation on October 31, 2022, which affects the requirement for landlords to negotiate payment plans with commercial tenants that qualify as a small businesses or nonprofit organization. Despite the end of the eviction moratorium and the lifting of the COVID-19 Emergency Orders, commercial landlords

We make our knowledge public.

News Category: Corporate & Business Law