Conditions precedent are critical provisions in commercial contracts that require specific events or actions to occur before contractual obligations become enforceable. These conditions serve as legal triggers, ensuring that duties arise only after certain criteria have been fulfilled. The primary purpose of such clauses is to reduce uncertainty, clearly define prerequisites to performance, and manage risk between contracting parties.
Until the specified conditions are met, neither party is obligated to perform, and failure to satisfy a condition typically suspends or extinguishes the affected obligations.
Washington courts have provided clear guidance on the nature and impact of conditions precedent. In Ross v. Harding, the court explained that conditions precedent are “facts and events, occurring subsequently to the making of a contract, which must occur before there is a right to immediate performance and thus before there can be a breach of contract duty.” 64 Wn.2d 231, 236, 391 P.2d 526 (1964). This underscores the point that the enforceability of a contract may hinge entirely on whether a condition precedent is fulfilled.
For example, if a condition precedent is not satisfied – such as failing to obtain a necessary permit – the related contractual duties do not arise. As reinforced in CHG Int’l, Inc. v. Robin Lee, Inc., “where a condition precedent is not performed within the time required, both parties’ contractual duties are discharged.” 35 Wn. App. 512, 515, 667 P.2d 1127 (1983).
Properly drafting and monitoring conditions precedent is essential to ensure that contracts reflect the parties’ intent and allocate risk appropriately. Ambiguities in how these provisions are drafted can lead to disputes over whether obligations have arisen or have been discharged. When drafted correctly, conditions precedent define when and how obligations become enforceable and set the legal obligations of all parties involved. Drafting clear, measurable condition, for example with specific timelines and consequences for nonperformance, can help mitigate legal disputes and align expectations.
For questions about this, or any other litigation matter, please contact any of the lawyers in Lasher’s Business Litigation practice group.
If you use names, images, or likenesses in your business, whether for advertising, endorsements, or creative projects, it is essential you understand Washington’s right of publicity laws. Here is what you need to know about how these laws work, who controls these rights, and how to stay compliant. Washington law recognizes that every individual has […]
The enforceability of noncompetition agreements is a widely debated topic in and outside of the legal world. In just the last year, it has been a repeat topic on the floor of the Washington state legislature. States across the county are seeing a trend toward the unenforceability of overly restrictive restraints on employees’ trade. Currently, […]
Residential construction contracts will often contain technical terms or jargon that leave many homeowners with uncertainty. Homeowners should be cautious of implicitly agreeing to language they do not understand when entering a construction contract. As a primer, the following are some words commonly found in residential construction agreements that homeowners should understand before entering into […]
Years of combined experience
Ranked regionally in 10 practice areas in the 2025 edition of Best Law Firms®
In the Chambers Global High Net Worth Guide in Family/Matrimonial Law
Trusted Legal Support for Your Business and Family
Our experienced Seattle attorneys provide strategic legal guidance for businesses and individuals. Whether you are navigating a complex transaction or facing a sensitive family law issue, we are here to help each step of the way.
Back
