Conditions precedent are critical provisions in commercial contracts that require specific events or actions to occur before contractual obligations become enforceable. These conditions serve as legal triggers, ensuring that duties arise only after certain criteria have been fulfilled. The primary purpose of such clauses is to reduce uncertainty, clearly define prerequisites to performance, and manage risk between contracting parties.
Until the specified conditions are met, neither party is obligated to perform, and failure to satisfy a condition typically suspends or extinguishes the affected obligations.
Washington courts have provided clear guidance on the nature and impact of conditions precedent. In Ross v. Harding, the court explained that conditions precedent are “facts and events, occurring subsequently to the making of a contract, which must occur before there is a right to immediate performance and thus before there can be a breach of contract duty.” 64 Wn.2d 231, 236, 391 P.2d 526 (1964). This underscores the point that the enforceability of a contract may hinge entirely on whether a condition precedent is fulfilled.
For example, if a condition precedent is not satisfied – such as failing to obtain a necessary permit – the related contractual duties do not arise. As reinforced in CHG Int’l, Inc. v. Robin Lee, Inc., “where a condition precedent is not performed within the time required, both parties’ contractual duties are discharged.” 35 Wn. App. 512, 515, 667 P.2d 1127 (1983).
Properly drafting and monitoring conditions precedent is essential to ensure that contracts reflect the parties’ intent and allocate risk appropriately. Ambiguities in how these provisions are drafted can lead to disputes over whether obligations have arisen or have been discharged. When drafted correctly, conditions precedent define when and how obligations become enforceable and set the legal obligations of all parties involved. Drafting clear, measurable condition, for example with specific timelines and consequences for nonperformance, can help mitigate legal disputes and align expectations.
For questions about this, or any other litigation matter, please contact any of the lawyers in Lasher’s Business Litigation practice group.
A client called me to ask how she could resolve a dispute with her business partner. After 10 years of working together circumstances had changed. They were no longer seeing eye-to-eye on business strategy and as 50-50 owners, their Company was in deadlock. They needed a separation. While a traditional lawsuit seeking dissolution of the […]
Washington’s construction lien statutes provide contractors with remedies to secure payment from property owners for furnished labor and/or materials. These statutory requirements are strictly enforced, and even minor mistakes can invalidate an otherwise legitimate lien and eliminate a contractor’s ability to foreclose. The following are some of the most common mistakes that can cause a […]
If you use names, images, or likenesses in your business, whether for advertising, endorsements, or creative projects, it is essential you understand Washington’s right of publicity laws. Here is what you need to know about how these laws work, who controls these rights, and how to stay compliant. Washington law recognizes that every individual has […]
Years of combined experience
Ranked regionally in 10 practice areas in the 2025 edition of Best Law Firms®
In the Chambers Global High Net Worth Guide in Family/Matrimonial Law
Our experienced Seattle attorneys provide strategic legal guidance for businesses and individuals. Whether you are navigating a complex transaction or facing a sensitive family law issue, we are here to help each step of the way.
Contact Us
Back
